It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary. Despite the fact that rats, mice and birds are excluded from the Animal Welfare Act, activist reform groups have just started their mission and are nowhere near the end.
Everyone, whether they are for or against animal testing, are very biased about their ideas but I will also tell you about the valuable things that are generated from animal testing.
The genetic difference between species can affect its ability to defend itself or a difference in the placenta may also affect the animal tests.
Small animals share a shoe box sized cage with at least eight other small animals. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this. Therefore animals will have different reactions to things we can easily fix. All forms of media, magazines, radio, television, newspapers, have increased their exposure of animal right protests over the last several years while giving room for groups to produce their own publications.
Many people argue that testing on animals is the most efficient way to know that our products are safe. Can we trust that animals will have the same reactions to a product as a human would? Animals are not use to the everyday stuff humans use, so of course animals will react much differently than humans will.
For example dogs are used for cardiovascular work and mice are used for cancer research.
As a consequence, this testing may not be providing the safety that its proponents claim. Our plain existence can influence the behavior of animals and disturb activities such as feeding, care- giving, and mating conduct.
Also these tests are too insensitive and tend to disregard learning or behavioral problems. Those animals are less important and valuable then human beings anyways right? I believe that this is true, and computer programs will not give as many results, but they display results more quickly. Indeed, possibly even a cure for cancer and AIDS.
The animal rights movement has grown more and more complicated through its use of strategy and has successfully brought the issue of laboratory research to the eyes of the public. The human cells will either live or die.
Laboratory animals are put through these horrors every day. I feel that animal testing is definitely giving us nformation but it is not worth it for all the pain the animals are experiencing.
One example of another problem with animal experimentation are that animals can be given nicotine directly as opposed to being exposed to it as a human would for years.
No animals or humans are harmed or killed during any of these tests.
The usual projects that the students did were, starving animals to death, blinding the animals, mammalian surgery, and the injection of lethal substances. Many people are believed to be ignorant or misunderstand the nature of the lives that animals actually live, and are unable to understand the actual laboratory procedures and techniques.
In addition, they feel that many tests are not really important, and in fact animals are not only used to test new medicines but also new cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead.
Where are you all going to sleep or get dressed? After what I have read, yes I am very against animal testing. First and foremost, animal experiments are unkind and cause animals a lot of pain.
In these publications, activists constantly make the analogy between the work of abolitionists before the emancipation and the efforts of animal right activists. As for death to an animal; the experimenters will euthanize the animal after being tested on or will use the animal again for further testing until they are dead or useless.
Thus there are no provisions in this area that ban dissection or mistreatment, and the National Association of Biology Teachers are not responsible.Free example persuasive essay on Animal Experimentation: Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries One of the biggest problems and the main reason why animal experimentation should be banned is the large percentage of birth defects that occur.
Barbara F. Ethnical Themes. Here you will find an example of an IELTS animal testing essay. First and foremost, animal experiments are unkind and cause animals a lot of pain. In addition, they feel that many tests are not really important, and in fact animals are not only used to test new medicines but also new cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead.
Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
It is true that medicines and other products are. Apr 03, · Should Animal Testing Be Banned? March 8, By in my English class we were assigned to write a essay on a topic that matters to us most.
I agree,animals R not science experiments,they. Animal Testing Should be banned” Imagine having a hole drilled in your head without any anesthesia.
Many new experiments and laboratory practices have evolved with technology. This new technology doesn’t require animal testing. Animals deserve the use of anesthesia, painkillers and proper food and housing.
The key part in all this. Home > Opinions > Science > Should experiments on animals be banned? Add a New Topic. Should experiments on animals be banned? Add a New Topic; Add to My Favorites Experiments on animals should not be banned. Animal testing is an important method for scientific research.
Although scientists should make sure that they are following .Download