A comparison of the views of marx and kierkegaard

However, Kierkegaard is not arguing that morality is created by God ; instead, he would argue that a divine command from God transcends ethics. In some ways, it might have to do with our status as existential beings.

For existentialism, human alienation has neither beginning nor end. Another way to interpret subjectivity is the unique relationship between the subject and object. To love yourself in the right way and to love the neighbor correspond perfectly to one another, fundamentally they are one and the same thing.

If the question is where more truth can be found, in the objective relation or in the subjective relation, Climacus feels that the answer reveals itself in the comparison of the nominal Christian with the virtuous pagan: Marxism replies to the first question with a ringing affirmative.

For humanists, death was to be countered by making the sole span of existence allotted to mortal creatures as productive and joyous as possible. For Kierkegaard all Christian action should have its ground in love, which is a passion.

Indeed, it is impossible for a personal encounter to be analyzed in social terms, and for Marx, history is primarily a social phenomenon. Excessive preoccupation with death belongs to the psychopathology of civilisation.


It goes into the market to be sold. They are not immutable and irremovable aspects of nature and history but relative phenomena which in the course of development can change to the extent of becoming their own opposites.

It must be followed by a fresh exertion of creative revolt—which in turn will not reach its goal.

Marxism Versus Existentialism

Freedom, Necessity And Morality According to its supporters, the supreme merit of existentialism is its capacity to explain and safeguard human freedom. But the expectation that defeat lurks in ambush spreads scepticism and cripples the steadfastness of the inwardly divided individual at every step.

Any unsettled situation can give way to greater determination. It is not part of a historical process and it is not due to sensuous activity. Desire itself appears to be a desire for the infinite, as Plato once wrote. Even before physically participating in production, they surrender their labour power to the entrepreneur in return for the payment of the prevailing wage.

In this way, it is preferable according to Climacus to pray to a false god in truth rather than praying to the true God in untruth. Hence, the historical method is not applicable for Marx to personal experience. This predicament is all the more difficult because we are trapped in a maze of conflicting possibilities.

In making aircraft we have succeeded in putting the determinism of the material world to work for us, rather than against us. He would not disregard the importance of objective knowledge. This psychological quality, which is considered the most powerful manifestation of freedom, is the sole principle of moral worth.

This runs into conflict with their observation that the results of our activities are often at odds with our intentions, desires, and expectations. What is reflected upon is not the relation but that what he relates himself to is the truth, the true. Despite its zigzags, however, history has moved onward and upward from one stage to the next, from savagery to civilisation, for ascertainable reasons.

They contend that Marx has been misrepresented as a crude dialectical materialist by his orthodox disciples from Engels to Lenin—until the radical humanists revealed that he really was an ethical existentialist.Marxism Versus Existentialism.

Existentialism and Marxism take irreconcilable views on the nature of the relationship between the objective and subjective sides of human life, on the status, the interconnection, and the relative importance of the public and private worlds.

Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard

But Sartre wants to embrace both Kierkegaard and Marx without. Jul 31,  · Kierkegaard vs Hegel - Objectivity, Subjectivity, and Faith The following is a paper I submitted during my undergrad studies at Calvin College. I hope you find it beneficial and that it clarifies some of the nuances existing between thinkers like Kierkegaard and Hegel.

Marx's Criticism of Feuerbach and Its Application to Kierkegaard Karl Marx has a clearly expressed critique of Ludwig Feuerbach; this critique is contained in Marx's "Theses on Feuerbach." Of course there is no expressed criticism by Marx of Søren Kierkegaard since Marx was not familiar with Kierkegaard's works.

Søren Kierkegaard's philosophy has been a major influence in the development of 20th-century philosophy, especially existentialism and ultimedescente.comgaard was a 19th-century Danish philosopher who has been called the "Father of Existentialism".

His philosophy also influenced the development of existential psychology. Kierkegaard.

Marx's Criticism of Feuerbach and Its Application to Kierkegaard

Both Marx and Kierkegaard agree that in contemporary society many people feel alienated. But while Marx argues that the source of this alienation can be understood by focusing on material structures and economics, Kierkegaard insists that the source of human alienation is spiritual in character/5(3).

To a large extent, these views had even infiltrated the church in Kierkegaard’s day. Because of the cold, somber view that reason could bring a person to God, the church in Kierkegaard’s day had many empty seats.

A comparison of the views of marx and kierkegaard
Rated 0/5 based on 80 review